首页> 外文OA文献 >Implementing core nice guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care with a model consultation (MOSAICS): A cluster randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Implementing core nice guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care with a model consultation (MOSAICS): A cluster randomised controlled trial

机译:通过模型咨询(MOSAICS)在初级保健中实施骨关节炎的核心指导方针:一项集群随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective To determine the effectiveness of a model osteoarthritis consultation, compared with usual care, on physical function and uptake of NICE osteoarthritis recommendations, in adults ≥45 years consulting with peripheral joint pain in UK general practice. Method Two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with baseline health survey. Eight general practices in England. Participants: 525 adults ≥45 years consulting for peripheral joint pain, amongst 28,443 population survey recipients. Four intervention practices delivered the model osteoarthritis consultation to patients consulting with peripheral joint pain; four control practices continued usual care. The primary clinical outcome of the trial was the SF-12 physical component score (PCS) at six months; the main secondary outcome was uptake of NICE core recommendations by six months, measured by osteoarthritis quality indicators. A Linear Mixed Model was used to analyse clinical outcome data (SF-12 PCS). Differences in quality indicator outcomes were assessed using logistic regression. Results 525 eligible participants were enrolled (mean age 67.3 years, SD 10.5; 59.6% female): 288 from intervention and 237 from control practices. There were no statistically significant differences in SF-12 PCS: mean difference at the 6-month primary endpoint was -0.37 (95% CI -2.32, 1.57). Uptake of core NICE recommendations by six months was statistically significantly higher in the intervention arm compared with control: e.g. increased written exercise information, 20.5% (7.9, 28.3). Conclusion Whilst uptake of core NICE recommendations was increased, there was no evidence of benefit of this intervention, as delivered in this pragmatic randomised trial, on the primary outcome of physical functioning at six months. Trial registration ISRCTN06984617.
机译:目的在英国一般实践中,与常规治疗相比,确定模型性骨关节炎咨询对身体功能和NICE骨吸收的建议的有效性,建议≥45岁的成年人接受外周关节痛咨询。方法采用基线健康状况调查的两臂类群随机对照试验。英格兰的八种常规做法。参加者:在28,443名人口调查接受者中,有525名≥45岁的成年人接受了周围性关节痛的咨询。四种干预措施为咨询周围性关节痛的患者提供了模型性骨关节炎咨询服务。四种控制措施继续照常进行。该试验的主要临床结果是六个月时的SF-12身体成分评分(PCS);主要的次要结局是通过骨关节炎质量指标衡量的六个月内对NICE核心建议的吸收。线性混合模型用于分析临床结果数据(SF-12 PCS)。使用Logistic回归评估质量指标结果的差异。结果纳入525名合格参与者(平均年龄67.3岁,SD 10.5;女性59.6%):干预措施288人,控制措施237人。 SF-12 PCS差异无统计学意义:6个月主要终点指标的平均差异为-0.37(95%CI -2.32,1.57)。与对照组相比,干预组在六个月内对NICE核心建议的摄取在统计学上显着更高:书面运动信息增加了20.5%(7.9,28.3)。结论尽管增加了对NICE核心建议的采纳,但没有证据表明该干预对六个月的身体机能的主要结局具有益处,正如在该实用随机试验中所提供的那样。试用注册ISRCTN06984617。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号